Laurus (laurus_nobilis) wrote in bizarrereviews,
Laurus
laurus_nobilis
bizarrereviews

  • Mood:

*sigh*

I got a review for a very, very old fic today. The reviewer was nice enough, but all it said was that in book 5 we found out that Trelawney couldn't have been Remus's teacher.

The fic in question was posted on May 2002.

Not only that, but because I thought people wouldn't look at that, I added a line to the author's note: This was written before book 5 came out, which explains the difference in Trelawney's age.

*headdesk*

It wouldn't bother me if the review said anything else, but it was just that. Why? I obviously know it's obsolete. I've said so.
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
  • 2 comments