Laurus (laurus_nobilis) wrote in bizarrereviews,

  • Mood:


I got a review for a very, very old fic today. The reviewer was nice enough, but all it said was that in book 5 we found out that Trelawney couldn't have been Remus's teacher.

The fic in question was posted on May 2002.

Not only that, but because I thought people wouldn't look at that, I added a line to the author's note: This was written before book 5 came out, which explains the difference in Trelawney's age.


It wouldn't bother me if the review said anything else, but it was just that. Why? I obviously know it's obsolete. I've said so.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.